Est. in September 2010

This blog was started over one year ago. However, the record goes back even further. Tracing Dolores Lucero through our County has been part of this process and has been going on for at least two years. Starting with the Public Records on file with Whitmore School District, her path of destruction is wide and broad. Her challenges to authority, facts, and reason are well documented. One thing I have found during my research is that witnesses to her antics as well as victims of her antics CONTINUE to be afraid of her retaliation against them. I find the similar concerns expressed within this very community now. I urge you to see for yourself, watch a council meeting LIVE. Read through the mountain of records for yourself. Get educated. Get involved. This City is worth the effort.

facebook like

Contact Info

CONTACT US: ljazz2@att.net
(530) 275-6167

Wednesday, September 15, 2010

POSSIBLE CONFLICT OF INTEREST (CA Govt Code sec 83115)

"Question...if a council member of a California general law city is mentioned in a possible/pending litigation against the city should not that aforementioned council person recuse herself from voting on that closed session agenda item?
The reason I ask this question is that such a situation occurred in the City of Shasta Lake at their Tuesday, September 7, 2010 meeting. The council went into closed session to discuss the possible litigation. The results of the closed session were reported out by Mayor Greg Watkins. To wit, 5-0 against the city taking any action. The 5-0 vote indicates that council member Lucero did not recuse herself.
As you can see I am also sending this inquiry to the California Fair Political Practices Commission"

*copy of exact text I received, this letter was sent to the FPPC, R/S Editor, calaware.org, mgmt and atty for city of shasta lake

No comments:

Post a Comment